Time for another game analysis! I will be changing up how I present my analyses since I want to be able to explain the games by highlighting the important positions and critical points. Using the analysis board interface that Chess.com has would probably be useful if you would want to look at the games from beginning to end. But I found that putting lengthy comments on that board is just too tedious and explaining every move is unnecessary.
So for this game, I was playing Black and funnily enough, I faced the King's Gambit which I accepted. I wanted to have a little bit of fun although back then, I had no knowledge of the KGA. Especially from Black's point of view. So you'll find that the first few moves are probably out of book on my side. But I tried to be as solid as possible. No flashy sacrifices or anything that would compromise my position from the outset.
I did bring my queen out early which is probably all right since I was able to take some pawns from my opponent. However, as you know, there are always downsides to bringing your queen out early. The glaring issue would be the queen's vulnerability to attack thereby causing you to lose tempo. Even though I took a couple of my opponent's pawns, it did give him time to develop his pieces. But it didn't really worry me that much since my structure was intact.
My problems began when I started to lose focus. We came to a position that was somewhat similar to a Caro-Kann. From what I've observed in other games, the usual move for Black was c5. I did that but I failed to realize that my opponent was leagues ahead of me in development and he had more piece activity. Here is a critical point:
As you can see, my dark-squared bishop is misplaced. That's probably the start of my problems. I wanted to control the c1 square because I wanted to push c5. However, instead of simply keeping the tension or even pushing the c-pawn forward, I took the pawn on d4. That was the first mistake. At that point, things would have gone smoothly for me if I had continued my development or grabbed some space. Instead, I was left with a pawn that's an easy target and misplaced pieces.
The second problem is my queenside which is lagging in development. You could imagine that my dream position would have been to push c5, put my knight on c6, and the light-squared bishop on e6 or d7. I probably should have fianchettoed my dark-squared bishop as well. In hindsight, that would have been the best place for the dark-squared bishop. And perhaps, I could put my queen on e7 and my rook on c8. Solid.
But that's not what happened. Instead we have my pieces either on the side or on their original squares. The worst part of it is that after the position above, I castled. And you can see how stupid that move is. We both make several moves until we get to a familiar position. It actually leads us to one of the tactics puzzles I posted before. We get to this position:
It's White's turn to move and if you check out that tactics puzzle post, you'll see how White has a big advantage, if not a forcing win, against Black.
So anyway, lessons from this analysis. Always stick to the basics. Don't flatter yourself with trying to reinvent the wheel. Don't make callous moves either, there's a reason why solid moves are solid. Don't neglect your development or king safety. Also, if you're not used to facing a certain opening, tread with caution. It's better to be safe than mated in 8 moves.
So here's the full PGN:
Comments
Post a Comment